Gender Analysis of Sports Presenters

sex activity Analysis of Sports PresentersCHAPTER 5DISCUSSIONThe mind-set of general towards the gender roles in sportsBased on the passings in Chapter 4, the mindset of universal in Kuala Lumpur towards the gender roles in sports is to a greater extent open-minded in general. This means that the universe in Kuala Lumpur believed that sports ar non only males roles but it could be belonged to egg-producing(prenominal)s too. However, there is only Gunther et al.s (2011) lead to support that the mindset of the universe towards gender roles in sports is generally open-minded.From the findings, it is shown that the mindset of public disagreed that womanishs argon slight knowledgeable and slight competitive in sports as compare to males. This is support by the strike of Gunther et al. (2011), whereby the results shown that the public do not agree that females are less knowledgeable than males in sports. However, the findings of this vignette is contrasted by the domain by Short (2012), in which it was manpowerti unrivalledd that female sports broadcasters were seen as less competent and less knowledgeable in sports which showed contrast with the results of this write up. In an interview, Kremer (2011) as well as menti angiotensin-converting enzymed that public often criticized that women do not know roughly sports, which also run afouled with the findings of this study.Although the mindset of public in Kuala Lumpur is open-minded, they believed males are the dominants and males are stronger in sports. This is supported by the outcome in the study of sharpen for Gender equating in Iceland (2006), which has clearly tell that sports receive practically predominated by males or to say the attention is traditionally focused on males. Besides, the public in Kuala Lumpur also agreed that females show less interest in sports as compared to males. It is supported by the statement in Shines (2013) article where women are perceived as not interested a nd do not fool the skills in sports. This could be because gender discrimination in sports has not been eliminated, which caused females not reaching a certain status in the publics eye.In sum, the knowledge and the competency level of females in sports are not criticized in terms of their sex however, males are hush perceived as stronger and the dominants in sports.The curtilages of males dominate in sports professionAs the public perceived males are the dominants in sports profession, some primers have been find out in this research. Based on the findings in this research, the earth of males dominates in sports profession is highly because males are biologicly stronger than females. This is supported by the study conducted by Paulas (2013) where males are biologically stronger because of the structure of their body which differs from women. The research by Centre for Gender Equality in Iceland (2006) stated that biological reputation is part of the consideration for males a nd females in participating sports. As sports emphasize a lot on physical strengths, females might be physically bunglesome to participate in some sports because they are weak in strength. Toro and Sargent (2013) also concluded that males have the muscularity and superiority in sports because they run faster and cover faster than females. Males are overall to a greater extent superior in sports.The public in Kuala Lumpur count that traditional gender roles are another major reason which leads to domination of males in sports profession. McMahon (2011) had given a statement that the constitution of sports is masculine which is hardly related to feminine. Thus, this could be the reason that the public in Kuala Lumpur perceived sports as males gender roles. fit to the research by Centre for Gender Equality in Iceland (2006), males have traditionally practiced to predominant in sports bandage females are not.In contrast, the public in Kuala Lumpur showed very(prenominal) aroun d disagreed-to-neutral that sports show masculinity is the reason of males dominate in sports profession. According to Wildes study in 2007, sports are traditionally associated with males, masculinity and generally dominated by the males. In the eyes of the public in Kuala Lumpur, sports perchance show masculinity, but that is not really a reason of why males dominate in sports profession.Moreover, the public in Kuala Lumpur does not perceive males as more superior in sports. In other words, both females and males are cost in sports. In the study of Paulas (2013), an argument has been raised up by saying that men are bump than women in acting sports, which relates to the inherent biological features. However, females nominate be as skillful as males do because ones skillfulness is related to how much instruction has taught to one in playing sports. In Grahames (2012) article also mentioned that, the biological differences in males body have made them more superior in most of t he sports which differs from the opinion of the public in Kuala Lumpur.Besides, the public in Kuala Lumpur disagreed that the reason of males dominating in sports profession is because females are discourage to play sports. It is supported by Swanson (2009) where more females are encouraged to play sports after the canon of Title IX in 1972 as compared to the past. 2012 Olympic Games, the women athletes have some equal number as men and the ratio for athletes now is 5050 male-female ratios (Gee, 2013). As Olympic Games is a worldwide sports, this could mean that females present are encouraged to play sports universally.Furthermore, sports are not mainly intentional for males in the view of the public in Kuala Lumpur. However, in the study by Paulas (2013), he found out that sports were designed for men at the set-back place. Sports much(prenominal) as basketball game, football and baseball were created during the era where women were expected to closure in the kitchen and tak e care of the family. Sports were designed particularly based on males strengths and advantages where females can hardly beat males.As for most, the public in Kuala Lumpur do not believe that females are not competent in sports is the reason which caused males dominate in sports profession. Baiocchi-Wagner and Behm-Morawitz (2010) cited in their study that the public might be wrongly accused that females are less competent than males because males are better in playing sports. Also, Short (2012) also mentioned that women were seen as weak and less competent as compare to men which is not turn up to be the truth. As nowadays more and more females started to step into sports profession, in which has proven that they are competent to compete with males in sports.Based on the open-ended data provided, the public perceived males are the dominant in sports because it is mens interest. They are more passionate, enthusiast and willing to contribute their cartridge clip in playing sports. In contrast, females do not like sports because they do not like to be exposed to the sun and sports are swampy and sweaty for them. In previous studies, it is shown that males show higher interest in participating, watching, and excelling in sports (Deaner et al., 2012). It concludes that males are more motivated to involve sports related activities which lead to the controller of males in sports.An interesting reason that is concluded in the findings of this research is sociable and media influence. The preference of the social and media plays an important role in influencing the dominance of males in sports profession. The media coverage is more likely to focus on mens sports than womens sports. According to the study by Centre for Gender Equality in Iceland (2006), womens sports are often treated as less important than mens sports in media coverage. As a result, the public is able to be exposed to mens sports more than womens sports and to see males in sports has become a soci al expectation. In the study by Deaner et al. (2012) it was stated that sports interest is influenced by the societal gender roles, peers pressure, parents and so on. Thus, males will be more interested in participating sports while females have the social pressure to eschew sports.In the opinion of the public in Kuala Lumpur, education and parents influence also could be a reason of why males dominate in sports profession. As in the report by Garner (2012) stated that girls were being put off in physiological Education (PE) lesson because they have negative experience in participating PE such as being labeled as tomboy or unfeminine. Wetton et al. (2013) mentioned that the schools that lucky boys sports activities have discourage girls attendance in participating sports. Other than that, parents do hold an important role in encouraging their children to involve in sports (Quinton, 2013). In the study by Wetton et al. (2013), the family background of the children and stereotypical view of parents do influenced childrens decision to not take part in sports. As the traditional mindset of gender roles in sports, parents might be more supportive for their sons to participate in sports but not for their daughters. Thus, there are more males involving themselves in sports than females due to the education and parents influence, in which has caused the dominance of males in sports profession.The level of fortune of females to become sports broadcastersAs concluded from the total hit of the level of opportunity for females to become sports broadcasters, the public in Kuala Lumpur believed that females have slightly high opportunity to become sports broadcasters. This has supported by Shine (2013) by saying that some organizations have started to hire talented female sports broadcasters because females can bring aspiring changes in sports broadcasting field.The public in Kuala Lumpur think that the opportunity is now given to females and females should be given equ al opportunity to become sports broadcasters as males do. However, in the studies of Gunther et al. (2011) and Short (2012) showed that there are up to now inequalities in sports broadcasting field and this industry is lagging in creating equal opportunities for both males and females in worthy sports broadcasters. Although both of these studies are carried out in United States and England, but the public in Kuala Lumpur might be influenced by these leading countries.Besides, from the findings, it is shown that the public in Kuala Lumpur agreed that the opportunity for females on becoming sports broadcasters should be based on qualifications and skills rather than physical appearance. However, in the study of Gunther et al. (2011) found out that many stations are hiring attractive women no matter of their qualifications and skills just simply to retain their broadcasting license.The public word meaning of female sports broadcastersMoreover, this study has found out that the leve l of public acceptance of female sports broadcasters in Kuala Lumpur is high. The public did not particularly favored female or male sports broadcasters because they believed professionalism and knowledge of a sports broadcaster are important than ones gender. Even for those major sports or male-dominated sports such as basketball and football, they do not think that only male sports broadcasters are true in reporting it. However, it is not supported by Shine (2013), where stated in her research that even though females are knowledgeable in male-dominated sports, the public will perceive females as do not have the skills to cover male-dominated sports. As in the study by Baiocchi-Wagner and Behm-Morawitz (2010) stated that women imply to prove themselves twice to the public that they are worth as sports broadcasters. This has reflected that the acceptance of female in sports broadcasting field is very low.Many of the researchers have found out that the acceptance of female sports broadcasters were remaining low which contradict with this study. According to Futterman (2011), it has taken a long time for female sports broadcasters to be only partially accepted by the public. As long as gender discrimination and harassment still occurred, the acceptance of female in sports broadcasting will still low (Ebel, 2012). As time goes by, the difficulties or barriers for females have reduced, but the perception of the public on female sports broadcasters is pig-headedly unchanged (Starphoenix, 2008).