Saturday, March 9, 2019

Department of Homeland Security Essay

Returning from a vacation to Germany in February, freelance journalist Bill Hogan was selected for additional cover by customs officials at Dulles International Airport out of doors Washington. Agents searched his luggage, he said, then they told me that they were impounding my laptop. Shaken by the encounter, Hogan examined his bags and found the agents had similarly inspected the memory card from his camera. It was fortunate that I didnt use the laptop for work, he said, or I would have had to c each(prenominal) up all my sources and demonstrate them that the governing body had just seized their information. When customs offered to return the reckoner nearly ii weeks later, Hogan had it shipped to his lawyer. How common Hogans experience is remains unclear. But an April ruling by the U. S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found that the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees usance and Border Protection, does have full authority to search any electronic devices with out suspicion in the same way that it can inspect briefcases.Now, businesses and other organizations atomic number 18 pushing back, Congress is investigating, and lawsuits have been filed challenging how the program selects travelers for inspection. The ninth circuit ruling was the result of more than 20 lawsuits involving electronics seized from travelers who were nearly all of Muslim, Middle Eastern, or South Asian descent. Citing the lawsuits, customs officials decline to guess how many computers, storage drives, cellphones, and BlackBerrys they have confiscated or what happens to them afterward.Officials declined to testify at a recent Senate hearing, although they wrote in a prepared statement that officers have the right to check items such as laptops and other in-person electronic devices to batten down that any item brought into the country complies with applicable law and is not a threat to the American public. But congressional investigators say that copies of driv es are sometimes made, meaning customs could be duplicating corporate secrets, legal and financial data, individualised E-mails and photographs, along with stored passwords for accounts with companies ranging from Netflix to Bank of America.The practice of storing and duplicating material might be something that some(prenominal) opponents and disciples of seizure could tick off to regulate, says Kansas Republican Sen. Sam Brownback, an otherwise staunch supporter of customs authority. Larry Cunningham, an assistant district attorney from New York, told the hearing I am aware of no authority that would permit the government, without probable energise to believe it contains contraband, to keep a persons laptop or to copy the contents of its files. Whatever the case, the controversial practice has prompted some businesses to switch their policies about traveling with corporate information.Many now require employees to penetration data remotely to avoid confiscations. Seizure im mediately deprives an executive or association of the very dataand revenuea business trip was think to create, says Susan Gurley, head of the Association of Corporate Travel Executives, which is lobbying for greater transparency and government oversight of the confiscations. As a businessperson returning to the U. S. , you may suffer yourself effectively locked out of your electronic office indefinitely. Indeed, while Hogans computer was returned within two weeks, others say they have had theirs held for months.Customs insists that terrorism and shaver pornography are sufficient justification for electronics searches. And even civil libertarians agree it makes sense for customs to search luggage, which could pose immediate dangers to aircraft and passengers. But, says Marc Rotenberg, executive coach of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, customs officials do not go through briefcases to review and copy paper business records or personal diaries, which is apparently what they are now doing in digital form. These PDAs dont have bombs in them. And then there are the precedents that critics say the program could set. Imagine, they say, if other nations began seizing the laptops of U. S. travelers. We wouldnt be in a position to strongly object, Rotenberg says. Indeed, U. S. officials have advised visitors to this summers Olympics in Beijing that their laptops may be targeted for duplication or bugging by the Chinese. Illustration Picture omitted Bill Hogan, who had his laptop seized at an airport, waits for a Senate subcommittee hearing. -CHARLIE ARCHAMBAULT FOR USN&WR

No comments:

Post a Comment