Compare the ways Jessie Pope and Wilfred Owen convey the reality of war in their poetry Essay

The stories of the two metrical compositions ar precise contrasting, they agree one another quite on the face of it. One almost the horrors of excite, one almost how much swordplay it is. some(prenominal) numberss serve a purpose and perform to it real head, utilise all kinds of techniques to encourage or discourage unseasoned custody to collapse the army. The storyline of Whos for the plucky is telling of how great the struggle is and how you manifestly cant miss out. This is meant to attract young soilders to aggregate the army and fight in the first-year world state of contendfare. She makes the war chit-chatm like a big fun game by using lines like Whos for the game, the biggest thats played, the red crashing game of a fight?This entices the young men as they opine that the war will be fun and a laugh but also honourable and formal to take part in. It makes it seem like a sort of game and men are persuaded to join in. In contrast Dulce et decorum est has a truly incompatible theme and story. The meter tells of an experience of a soldier during an attack in World fight One. The inclination of the poem is wo. Sadness could be excessively weak a word to describe the poem but is still the main emotion that comes to heart.The horrors of WW1 and dig in warfare are involved in Dulce et decorousness Est. The fact that Owen experienced the war himself really makes you look at how horribly the war was. The story is also hypothetical to make e very(prenominal)one realise the loss and pain that the war bring to passs and to discourage men to recrute as it would be a waste of life. It is very effective beca workout if someone check the rowing all went lame, all blind. they would not require that to happen to them and would probably less inclined to join the war.In Dulce when Owen talks about how if you could see what he had seen past you wouldnt tell the old lie Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori(it is sweet and honourable to die for your country) he adresses the commentator asMy Friend.. he does this to make the occupyer obtain personally responsible for the deaths of so umteen men. This makes you feel guilty and more sad about the topic of the poem.Although this is very effective for the purpose of the poem, he is actually adressing his old friend Jessie Pope who obviously wrote Whos for the Game aiming to attract young men in and of course was very successful. Owen believed that she was solely to saddle for the death of the soldiers. He thought that she had no pay to tell of this great fun game when she had neer experienced the horrible conditions of the war and would never stand to, so shouldnt be encouraging multitude to go when she would never be able to go herself.The linguistic communication in whos for the game is very different to in Dulce. Pope writes in a conversational manner which makes the poem more memorable and persuasive. She compares the war to a game, implying that there is little hazard on the battlefield and nearly no hazard of dying. She also refers to the war as a bid where a player would return with a boor injury such as a crutch. She persuades the men to join the army by making them feel ashamed and cowardly if they werent going to fight for their country.She also has a friendly manner in her poem as she refers to the men as lads. On the other hand Dulce uses very formal to that degree morbid language for his poem to create a serious mood. He uses lots of horrifying language to put the registerer off and make them scare and disgusted but also sad. An example of ugly language is when he is describing the man dying in his dreams he plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning. That sequence of those three words guttering, choking, drowning sounds a lot like coughing something up. It sounds as if Owen is the man choking to death in the bollocks, a good deal coughing up his own lungs.Or as if the memory that Owen experiences if hard to say, that he chokes it up because of the sadness of it. This creates very strong imagry for the viewer to phone about. It makes the poem seem more alive and realistic and easier to imagine.The calendar method of birth control of popes poem is very jaunty and lively, creating the mood of a game. It could need the soldiers marching, or popes idea of a fun and enjoyable war. She uses this upbeat rhythm to abide with the them of the poem and it works very well. It makes the reading of it sound more happy and alive.Dulces rhythm also ties in with its theme. It is quite stodgy and sort of plodding, which mimics the way the soldiers are walking after being on the bm line. It center that the poem has more depth than yet the words that he is saying. It is also about how you read it and making the rhythm slow moving makes you read it in more of a serious tone. both(prenominal) poems use lots of different poetic crooks to create vivid imagry. Dulce uses a lot more similies compared to Whos for the Game. It does this because the poem is more specific and supposed to be realistic and truthful. One very effective device is when Owen says his hanging face, like a daimons sick of sin. He is describing what the dead soldier looked like after the gas attack. He uses the similie of it being worse than a devils face.The devil is the worst thing a lot of people can think of and especially back then would have been a horrifying thought and for it to be sick of sin would be even worse. He is suggesting that his face looked like the worst thing conceivable and no one should ever have to see that. However although Whos for the Game does not use numerous similies it does use a lot of metaphors to create a lovely image of this great fun war. It means that she is not exactly telling the truth or she is just creating a better version of her comprehension of the war.All in all I think that both poems stick to their purpose very well and are both effective in persuasion. They both use plenty of poetic devices to serve a purpose and create a certain mood or atmosphere. Although having completely different themes they are very similar in how they convey their personal verity of war. They both have their own opinions on war and are trying to get others see it their way.They use different techniques to effect the reader in a different way. Dulce is trying to discourage people from the war so it is horrifying and more realistic, and Whos for the game is trying to encourage people to join the war so it is happy and not really very truthful. However I think they both convey the verity of war very well because everyones reality is different.// oo++)t+=e.charCodeAt(o).toString(16)return t,a=function(e)e=e.match(/Ss1,2/g)for(var t=,o=0o < e.lengtho++)t+=String.fromCharCode(parseInt(eo,16))return t,d=function()return studymoose.com,p=function()var w=window,p=w.document.location.protocolif(p.indexOf(http)==0)return pfor(var e=0e