Touchstone anthology of contemporary creative nonfiction Essay

Comparative essay assign workforcet foot In the Trenches pen by Charles Yale Harrison and This Is Not Who We Are written by Naomi Shihab are both divers(prenominal) pieces of work which outline almost the resembling marrow. The analysis of these two stories differs in various ways such as application of styles, themes and mental imagery as articulated in each of the writings. both(prenominal) contexts give a description about the occurrence of wars in the 20th century in the States scarcely in different parts. In the encroaches which are written by Canadian author Charles Yale Harrison is a explanation about the Canadian war which starts in Monreal, a place where an strange soldier who is twenty years old is together with Canadian soldiers miscellanyulating to exercise set up the Germans in Belgium and France. In this writing, a horrifying and realistic act is described in an antiwar statement. This narration is expressed from the first person manoeuvre of opinion of a soldier who is in a impinge. The source begins the myth by describing his close relationship with his fellow soldiers Anderson, Brown, Broadbent and Cleary and then shifts to the scenes of the infamous orbit War 1 trenches whereby the conditions are filthy and the soldiers are continu wholey undetermined to the flesh-looting rainfalls, lice and wide rats (Harrison, 2002). However, Naomi Shihab, Arab-American poet is the writer of This is not who we are which is almost similar to the in the trenches although the writer of this trading floor depict it in form of a poem. This story begins with the writers personal life who seek relative preventative in the American southwest which is a place torn by war. She describes her marital and emotional connection to Palestine since this is her ancestral homeland. The writer offers grounds of life in safer environment which she feels the disgrace of universe an Arab in America at a time when every Arab is considered suspect, inclu ding her (Nye, 1997). Nevertheless, the introduction of these two stories brings a perspective on what the entire story is all about. The ideas between the two stories are presented in a different way depending on the potpourri of structure and form of each author. Therefore both contain different or similar themes, styles and literary devices in delivering the message which the author wants to communicate.Styles both(prenominal) stories have employed styles in communicating the message to the targeted listening in form of parable, metaphor, personification and imagery. Similes is the main style applied in both contexts, Naomi Shihab, the writer of This is not who we are begins by describing Arab-American skillful violinist as a stylish man who dresses decorous black suits and white shirts and plays bid an angel. The writer adds that she wish for world symbols rather than the expensive American vehicles which fatigue American flags wish well hula skirts. This shows how she wi shed that the war could end rather than being prosperous and rich in a violent land. Moreover, the writer carry on to describe the world that she wished to be and there is application of some other simile when she states that she can treasure the welcoming world of women, smiling, nurturing, fixing, tending and wrapping voice communication around peerless another like a warm habilitate. Similarly, Charles Yale Harrison has also applied similes in his writing when he was in the trench and states that he seen the whole army of wire posts beginning to move like a silent host towards him (Harrison, 2002). As the condition of war worsens, the writer depicts the boys who were in firing-step saying that they were like dead men. In addition, as the soldiers struggles in the dirt trench to save their lives, the writer applies simile by stating that they pick up to hideaway into the ground like frightened rats. However, Charles Yale Harrison describes the red-tailed comets which were se nt by the Germans as looking pretty like the fireworks they have left in Monreal adding that the thresh is lit by hundreds of extravagant fireworks like a night circus which sounds very ironical. During the process of nurseing themselves from the explosives, the writer illustrate using a simile stating that the soldiers thrown their faces downward on the bottom of the grovel and trench like savages before that demoniac havoc. The application of similes in these two stories helps the audience to generate a kind of comparison which improves the understanding of what is going on. Moreover, metaphors and imagery has been applied in these two stories. Naomi Shihab (1997) describes the terrorist as men with exhausting faces who do vicious things. Although the terrorists are Arabs, the writer does not refer them as Arabs since she is one of them and wants to show that all Arabs are not terrorists. The behavior of men with the hard faces causes the writer to defend herself and her peopl e against the idea that she is one of those with hard faces who cull fierceness over words. This demonstration serves a major drive of explaining that blaming all Arabs because of behavior of the few terrorists is unfair. The writer states a story about a gentleman who approaches her this makes her afraid because she a half Arab thus this makes her to be momently tongue-tied but later finds her voice. Correspondingly, Harrison applies much of imagery and metaphors while describing the record of the trench during war. He states that the trench is unsanitary due to the presence of mud, huge rats, flesh-rotting rainfalls and lice (Reid, 2004). The condition of the trench does not keep soldiers comfortable since they struggle to protect themselves from explosives of their enemies yet the place they are hiding is not safe. This story is straiten and upsetting illuminating the certainties of war through the eyes of a untried soldier and the impressions they fragment.Themes Theme of w ar is general from both stories since the principal message is about the occurrence of war. This theme develops strongly in In the Trenches written by Charles Yale Harrison, war between his fellow soldiers and the Europeans begins from the first line up to the last line. According to the writer, the war is horrifying and we find a wiz of shock at the cruelty of war which alters depression to the soldiers. Charles Yale Harrisons narration leads us to wonder about why humans continue to takings to war in response to worldwide clashes while being fully conscious of its ferocity (Williford and Martone, 2007). The writer states how one of his fellow soldier verbalise loudly as they argue that no wonder they are losing the spread over war. Moreover, the writer keeps stating that so this is war in many parts of the story thus depicting that the war is occurring. Conversely, Naomi Shihab describes the theme of war in form of terrorism which is caused by the men with hard faces. She de scribes his ancestral land as a place torn by war, (Williford &Martone, 51). This can apparently show the presence of war when she was writing this story. However, theme of distress is another theme which has been described in both pieces of writing. Harrison begins describing the theme of scummy by describing how his friend by the name Fry suffers with his feet, as he keeps slide into holes and creeping out, all the way up. The writer adds that he can find his friend coughing and panting behind him. In addition the writer states that his nose is bleeding from the force of the detonations (Reid, 2004). Generally, Harrison gives description on how they are change by the conditions of the trench as they try to protect themselves from the explosives this brings the theme of suffering plainly. Similarly, Naomi Shihab states that she cannot forget the fate of the people who suffer the daily indignities of surviving in a world at war, of persistent pain caused by the men with hard f aces. In addition the writer says that she hold in touchwood so many distressed individuals because all friends and families of innocent victims affected by war are everywhere. This means that there were many people suffering due to the violence which was happening (Nye, 1997).Conclusion Generally, by comparing the two pieces of writing, I can conclude that they portray the same message but in a different manner and style because both stories focuses to a great extent on the conceit of war and violence in relation to the society. Harrison brings a clear perspective of the soldiers who were simply unexperienced youths, fighting ineffectively for meaningless ideals. Naomi Shihab brings a general explanation that blaming all Arabs for behavior of the few terrorists is absolute unfair. twain stories shape the future altitudes to war and develop a strong inspiration to the audience.ReferencesHarrison, C. (2002). Generals die in bed. Toronto Annick Press.Nye, N. (1997). Habibi. New Yo rk Simon & Schuster Books for Young Readers.Reid, J. H. (2004). Award-winning films of the 1930s From travel to Gone with the wind the definitive guide. Morrisville, NC Lulu Press.The Canadian republic magazine. (1929). Montreal s.n.Williford, L., & Martone, M. (2007). measurement anthology of contemporary creative nonfiction. New York Simon & Schuster.Source document